GLM-5.2 Now on SiliconFlow: 1M Context, Long-Horizon Engineering, Near-Opus Coding

目錄

TL;DR:

  • GLM-5.2 is Z.ai's latest open-source flagship, now live on SiliconFlow.

  • Features: Frontier-level coding, agentic, and long-horizon performance: it matches or beats GPT-5.5 on several public benchmarks (FrontierSWE, SWE-bench Pro, MCP-Atlas) and lands within ~1–4 points of Claude Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic tasks.

  • Cost on SiliconFlow: Less than a quarter of Opus 4.8's cost per long-horizon task.

  • Get started: OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible APIs drop into Claude Code, Cline, Hermes Agent, OpenCode and your existing tools in minutes.

For developers using AI models, the trade-off has been clear: pay a premium for frontier closed-source models, or compromise on capability with open alternatives.

GLM-5.2 changes that. Z.ai's latest open-source flagship delivers frontier-level coding and long-horizon task execution with usable 1M context window, matching Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5 and even Fable 5 — all while costing less than a quarter as much per long-horizon task.

Now available on SiliconFlow, GLM-5.2 gives builders frontier-level coding within reach: competitive with GPT-5.5, close to Opus 4.8 on many tasks, all at a fraction of the cost.

GLM-5.2 on SiliconFlow

Context window

1049K tokens

Input

$ 1.40 / M tokens

Output

$ 4.40 / M tokens

Cache read

$0.26 / M tokens

Capabilities

Function Calling · Context Caching · Thinking · Dual Reasoning effort

Precision

FP8

Why GLM-5.2 stands out

  • Usable 1M Context: A million-token context that can reliably sustain project-scale codebases and long-running engineering workflows, not just accept longer prompts.

  • Built for Long-Horizon Engineering: Designed to stay on track across implementation, debugging, optimization, and research tasks, allowing complex engineering work to be completed within a single workflow.

  • Flexible Reasoning, Production-Ready Coding: High and Max reasoning modes let you balance latency, cost, and coding quality for different workloads, while architectural improvements keep million-token inference practical and efficient.

From benchmarks to real engineering

Capability claims are only meaningful if they hold up under evaluation.

Across public benchmarks, GLM-5.2 is the strongest open-source model available today and sits within striking distance of the closed-source frontier across long-horizon engineering, coding, and agentic tasks.

Benchmark performance

Category

Benchmark

GLM-5.2

GLM-5.1

Opus 4.8

GPT-5.5

Note

Long-horizon

FrontierSWE

74.4

30.5

75.1

72.6

Beats GPT-5.5 by 1.8 points

PostTrainBench

34.3

20.1

37.2

28.4

2nd only to Opus 4.8

SWE-Marathon

13.0

1.0

26.0

12.0

Surpass GPT-5.5

Coding

Terminal-Bench 2.1

81.0

63.5

85.0

84.0

Within 4 points of Opus 4.8

SWE-bench Pro

62.1

58.4

69.2

58.6

Beats GPT-5.5 by 3.5 points

Agentic

MCP-Atlas

76.8

71.8

77.8

75.3

Within 1 point of Opus 4.8

Tool-Decathlon

48.2

40.7

59.9

55.6

Largest gap to Opus 4.8 in this table

Third-party

CodeArena-Frontend

#2

#9

#4


Top available (Fable 5 export-restricted for non-US users)

Design Arena

#1

#6


#19

Beats Fable 5, Opus 4.6 & 4.7

AA-Briefcase

1266 Elo


1356 Elo

1159 Elo

~90 below Opus 4.8, <25% of the cost

Real-world Performance

To understand what GLM-5.2 actually feels like to build with, we compared it against GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 using the exact same prompts under identical conditions.

This isn't about declaring a winner. It's about showing where GLM-5.2 reaches frontier-level performance, where it stands out, and where trade-offs remain.

What stood out

All four models produced runnable HTML on the first try. But GLM-5.2 showed a clear leap over GLM-5.1 in composition, interaction, and polish.

The biggest difference appeared in “Light & Shadow.” GLM-5.2 turned the prompt’s “slow, weighted, architectural motion” into a dynamic sun-and-shadow system. Claude Opus 4.8 handled this well too, while GPT-5.5 took a more conservative, card-based approach.

On this task, GLM-5.2 came close to Claude Opus 4.8 in output quality, while being about 3.6x cheaper on input and 5.7x cheaper on output on SiliconFlow.

For visual interfaces, landing pages, prototypes, and interactive demos, GLM-5.2 offers a compelling balance of frontend coding ability, design judgment, and cost efficiency.

Run GLM-5.2 with Your Existing Tools

Numbers and demos can only tell you so much — the fastest way to know if GLM-5.2 fits your workflow is to run it yourself. And that only takes minutes.

Try it first, no setup

Open the SiliconFlow Playground and chat with GLM-5.2 right in your browser.

Tune temperature, top-p, and reasoning effort (High / Max), or run two models side by side on the same prompt — put GLM-5.2 next to GLM-5.1 and see the jump for yourself.

Plug into your tools

SiliconFlow APIs are both OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible, so GLM-5.2 drops straight into any tool that supports a custom provider — same SDK, same code, just a new base URL and model string. Live in minutes.

Tool

SiliconFlow Integration Guide

Claude Code

Command-line AI assistant for terminal coding workflows

Cline

Autonomous agent for VS Code

OpenCode

Open-source AI coding agent for flexible development workflows

Hermes Agent

Autonomous server agent that remembers, runs, and improves

SillyTavern

Roleplay / creative chat

And more

Continue, Janitor AI, CodeWhale … — integration guides

What you need to connect:

Base URL

https://api.siliconflow.com or

https://api.siliconflow.com/v1

SiliconFlow API Key

Get yours at cloud.siliconflow.com/account/ak

Model string

zai-org/GLM-5.2

Get Started Immediately

  1. Build: Try GLM-5.2 on SiliconFlow through the playground.

  2. Integrate: Use our OpenAI-compatible API. Explore the full API specifications in the SiliconFlow API documentation.

import requests

url = "https://api.siliconflow.com/v1/chat/completions"

payload = {
    "model": "zai-org/GLM-5.2",
    "stream": True,
    "max_tokens": 4096,
    "enable_thinking": True,
    "temperature": 1,
    "top_p": 0.95,
    "messages": [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": "How many r’s are in the word strawberry?"
        }
    ]
}
headers = {
    "Authorization": "Bearer <token>",
    "Content-Type": "application/json"
}

response = requests.request("POST", url, json=payload, headers=headers)

print(response.text)
import requests

url = "https://api.siliconflow.com/v1/chat/completions"

payload = {
    "model": "zai-org/GLM-5.2",
    "stream": True,
    "max_tokens": 4096,
    "enable_thinking": True,
    "temperature": 1,
    "top_p": 0.95,
    "messages": [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": "How many r’s are in the word strawberry?"
        }
    ]
}
headers = {
    "Authorization": "Bearer <token>",
    "Content-Type": "application/json"
}

response = requests.request("POST", url, json=payload, headers=headers)

print(response.text)
import requests

url = "https://api.siliconflow.com/v1/chat/completions"

payload = {
    "model": "zai-org/GLM-5.2",
    "stream": True,
    "max_tokens": 4096,
    "enable_thinking": True,
    "temperature": 1,
    "top_p": 0.95,
    "messages": [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": "How many r’s are in the word strawberry?"
        }
    ]
}
headers = {
    "Authorization": "Bearer <token>",
    "Content-Type": "application/json"
}

response = requests.request("POST", url, json=payload, headers=headers)

print(response.text)

Business or Sales Inquiries →

Join our Discord community now →

Follow us on X for the latest updates →

Explore all available models on SiliconFlow →

準備好 加速您的人工智能開發了嗎?

準備好 加速您的人工智能開發了嗎?

準備好 加速您的人工智能開發了嗎?